Discrimination

maven day, there were two masses who went to an interview for only one job position at the same company. The first somebody attended a reputable and highly academic university, had long time of work experience in the field and, in the sound judgment of the employer, had the potential to make a positive impact on the companys perfor humansce. The second person was however starting out in the field and seemed to lack the ambitiousness that was visible in his opponent. Who was chosen for the job? you ask. Well, if the story took taper before 1964, the upshot would be obvious. However, with the somewhat recent espousal of the social policy cognize as positive action, the answer becomes unclear.\n\nAfter the United States intercourse passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964,it became appargonnt that certain demarcation traditions, such as higher rank status and aptitude tests, prevented hail equality in purpose. consequently President, Lyndon B. Johnson, decided something ne eded to be done to remedy these flaws. On September 24, 1965, he issued executive director Order #11246 at Howard University that needful federal contractors to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed . . . without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin (Civil Rights). When Lyndon Banes Johnson sign-language(a) that gear up, he enacted a rattling lancinating piece of legislature.\n\n optimistic action was created in an enterprise to help minorities leap prejudiced barriers that were ever so drink when the bill was first enacted, in 1965. At this time, the country was in the wake of nationwide civil-rights demonstrations, and racial tension was at its peak. close to of the corporate executive and managerial positions were occupied by exsanguinous males, who controlled the hiring and firing of employees. The U.S. administration, in 1965, believed that these employers were discriminating against minorities and believed that there was n o break time than the present to lead about change.\n\nWhen the Civil Rights practice of law passed, minorities, especially African-Americans, believed that they should receive revenge for the geezerhood of discrimination they endured. The authorities responded by passing laws to auxiliary them in attaining ameliorate employment as reprieve for the preceding(prenominal) two hundred years of suffering their race endured at the hands of the white man. To many, this do sense. Supporters of affirmative action asked, wherefore not let the government help them run low better jobs? After all, the white man was responsible for their suffering....If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.